+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: LQQK! Photo Analysis: No Plane Hit 2nd Tower

  1. #1

    Default LQQK! Photo Analysis: No Plane Hit 2nd Tower

    From Crash physics for everyone

    ....And then there is the matter of the videos of the planes.

    None of the videos show a crash, the plane just enters the building in a totally impossible way.

    Not one of the videos has a correct image of a 767.

    The one touted as the best, and often used to “prove” that remote-control gear was fitted to the plane is a composite, using a tail plane that is both at the wrong angle and the wrong orientation compared to the rest of the plane:


    It is analysed here:
    http://911review.org/flight175photo.html

    And different videos show the planes in different positions at the same time. They disagree.

    Even the images of the planes don't look right.

    Stills from a video of the 2nd hit show an aircraft that looks "set into the building"- there is no damage to the building in between the left engine and the fuselage, where the wing can no longer be seen (It is supposed to have already entered the building) and there is no damage to the windows that are right next to the parts of the aircraft that has already penetrated the wall.

    This is impossible.

    Also the left tail plane is missing in this shot:


    Another still shows the left wing is missing from the image:



    >>>CONTINUED>>>>>
    Last edited by zengrifter; March 30th, 2007 at 02:32 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    >>>CRASH PHYSICS CONTINUED>>>

    Yet another still shows the right wing to have passed into the building yet the wall where it has gone through is still undamaged:



    The poor quality of the video can not account for the missing wing; the face of the building is visible where the wing should be.
    And none of the videos show a CRASH as discussed above.

    Look at this still from another video:

    It doesn't even look like anything.

    A few frames later, after the insertion is no longer there we get to see the hole starting to be made.

    There is a large event in the center and three separate events around it.
    These events lead to the creation of the cartoon-style plane-shaped cut-out that no real plane could have made.


    >>>CONTINUED>>>
    Last edited by zengrifter; March 30th, 2007 at 02:30 AM.

  3. #3

    Default

    >>>CRASH PHYSICS CONTINUED>>>

    In fact a real plane couldn't get through these holes even in bits
    because of the obstructions that remained in place:


    XXX
    Last edited by zengrifter; March 30th, 2007 at 02:29 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA
    Posts
    124

    Default

    I strongly disagree, you can still see the image of both wings in those two pictures, although the 2nd pic is barely visible due to where the sun was shining WRT to the left and right wing.

  5. #5

    Default

    FROM COFFINMAN -

    The No Plane Blues

    I would like to address a problem
    That's big in the world
    It's a big, big problem affecting
    The whole of the world.
    And it's such a big problem that it
    Is destroying our world.

    You see we were fed a big lie
    Adn they used T.V.
    Things that never happened were broadcast
    For us to see.
    You see the planes we all saw hit the South tower
    Were all C.G.

    When a plane hits a building
    It crumples and breaks.
    To breach the Trade Center outerwalls Baby,
    Do you know what it'd take?
    Seven thousand, eight hundred miles an hour Baby,
    That's what it would take.

    And the plane would explode
    When it hit the wall.
    Not park up first inside
    No that couldn't happen at all.
    But they did that with the C.G.I
    and that fooled us all
    (Well not all).

    So then that's what they showed us
    On our T.V.s
    Live action images they said
    For us to see.
    But no plane hit any building because
    They were C.G.

    Then the towers were destroyed
    They were turned to dust.
    Both the buildings and their contents
    turned completely to dust.
    So how can you turn steel and concrete
    completely to dust?

    Maybe a beam type weapon
    Could do that job right.
    A secret Star-Wars program beam weapon
    If you used it right.
    And that would explain those circular holes in the buildings
    At the Ground Zero site.

    So the media and the military
    Planned this thing together
    To create a false climate
    of international terror.
    So they could eventually force a one world government on us
    to "bring us together".

    So the hijackers and Al-Quaida
    They are just a lie
    Used to send troops to target countries
    To murder and die
    So that the New World Order can make slaves
    Of you and I.

    xxx

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    lost in cyberspace
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEDITANK View Post
    I strongly disagree, you can still see the image of both wings in those two pictures, although the 2nd pic is barely visible due to where the sun was shining WRT to the left and right wing.
    I would agree. The closer up pictures are blurry and it almost looks like there isn't a left wing, but you can see it there.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEDITANK View Post
    I strongly disagree, you can still see the image of both wings in those two pictures, although the 2nd pic is barely visible due to where the sun was shining WRT to the left and right wing.
    I agree with you too...looks like shitty video. I'm not quite ruling out the whole conspiracy thing, but basing all of this rationalization on crappy pics is iffy.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by person1125 View Post
    I would agree. The closer up pictures are blurry and it almost looks like there isn't a left wing, but you can see it there.
    Video experts (some) are adamant that the several video are all just animation. zg

  9. #9

    Default

    No Planes ???
    Posted by: "Ben Noyes" banoyes2@yahoo.com banoyes2
    Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:37 am (PST)

    The TV Fakery is clear enough... brilliant
    I am unsure about the missing planes
    If there were never any airplanes hijacked
    What happened to the crew and passengers?

    Flight 11 92 Fatal.
    Flight 175 65 Fatal.
    Flight 77 64 Fatal.
    Flight 93 44 Fatal

    265 people, whom, I assume, all had family.
    another thing that remains unclear, if there were no planes hijacked
    the air traffic controllers
    they all report transponders shut off and the flight paths
    How could this be accomplished?
    Evidence clearly shows no planes involved in crashes
    yet
    265 families and the air controllers say different
    What happened to the people?
    What were the air traffic controllers responding to during the "hijackings"

    FAA contacted Otis Air Force base informing them Flight 11 was headed to Manhattan and had lost its identification signal by 8:30.

    After leveling off at 25,000 feet and making a slight course change to the east-northeast, Flight 77 has its autopilot disconnected. It remains off for about three minutes before being re-engaged. This is according to information later obtained from its flight data recorder

    Indianapolis flight control reports the loss of contact with Flight 77 to the FAA’s Great Lakes Regional Operations Center. They describe it as a possible crash. The center waits 15 minutes before passing the information to FAA headquarters at 9:24 a.m.

    Indianapolis controllers had noted the last known position of Flight 77 as being near the Ohio-Kentucky border

    Is the story of Cheney a fall back, seems dangerous to Cheney

    "Mineta says that, while a suspicious plane is heading toward Washington, an unidentified young man comes in and says to Cheney, “The plane is 50 miles out.” Mineta confers with Acting FAA Deputy Administrator Monte Belger, who is at the FAA’s Washington headquarters. Belger says to him, “We’re watching this target on the radar, but the transponder’s been turned off."

    "At one time I was told that across the nation there were some 29 different reports of hijackings."
    Robert Marr, head of NEADS on 9/11
    Something is way out of line with this, who is reporting these hijackings?
    Do they accept anonymous phone calls?

    http://complete911timeline.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&day_of_9/11=dayOf911&startpos=200

    Keep the faith
    BAN
    Reasearch stuff an stuff
    BaNoyes.tripod.com


    ---------------------------------
    Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
    Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.

    Back to top
    Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post
    Messages in this topic (2)


    ===================================


    Re: No Planes ???
    Posted by: "The Webfairy" webfairy@webfairy.org the_webfairy
    Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:44 pm (PST)

    Time to start reading Holmgren.
    He answers all those questions and more.
    http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Eholmgren/intro.html

    The last of the planes was parted out in 2004.
    Apparently they were used for renditions and drug running til they wore out.

    http://webfairy.org/dulce
    has Dulce Decorum's dogged search for the planes.

    Some of the passengers were fake. Some got disappeared, given a ticket
    on a flight that was cancelled at least a week in advance.
    It is ground we covered before Nico joined us and started the push to TV
    Fakery.

    xxx
    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  10. #10

    Default

    And, of course, no 757 hit the Pentagon, either -

    -----------



    New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth:
    No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

    Thu Jun 21, 3:01 AM ET

    Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.

    Madison, WI (PRWEB) June 21, 2007 - A study of the black box data provided by the government to Pilots for 9/11 Truth has confirmed the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11. "We have had four lines of proof that no Boeing 757 hit the building," said James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. "This new study by Pilots drives another nail into a coffin of lies told the American people by The 9/11 Commission":

    ...more - http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/200706.../prweb534642_1
    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  11. #11

    Default

    MORE EVIDENCE OF 9/11 VIDEO FAKERY

    Accused Fake WTC 2nd Hit Footage Filmer Cannot Talk About Own Video
    Says he doesn't have to talk and lawyer won't let him say anything at all, not even
    where he was on 9/11 when he supposedly filmed WTC 2nd Plane Crash

    VIDEO- http://www.livevideo.com/video/stall...hit-foota.aspx

    ------------

    AND THEN LOOK WHO HE's CONNECTED TO -

    Surprising links between the Bush Administration, covert operations in Angola,
    an unsolved murder case, and a 9/11 video.

    VIDEO- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpyBt...%2Dwont%2Ehtml
    Last edited by zengrifter; August 8th, 2007 at 10:57 AM.
    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    214

    Default next on the list

    it was all a figment of our imagination that 911 ever happened !!! Please those people need a life and drop in to reality !!!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zengrifter View Post
    From Crash physics for everyone....And then there is the matter of the videos of the planes.None of the videos show a crash, the plane just enters the building in a totally impossible way.Not one of the videos has a correct image of a 767.The one touted as the best, and often used to “prove” that remote-control gear was fitted to the plane is a composite, using a tail plane that is both at the wrong angle and the wrong orientation compared to the rest of the plane:It is analysed here:http://911review.org/flight175photo.htmlAnd different videos show the planes in different positions at the same time. They disagree.Even the images of the planes don't look right.Stills from a video of the 2nd hit show an aircraft that looks "set into the building"- there is no damage to the building in between the left engine and the fuselage, where the wing can no longer be seen (It is supposed to have already entered the building) and there is no damage to the windows that are right next to the parts of the aircraft that has already penetrated the wall.This is impossible.Also the left tail plane is missing in this shot:Another still shows the left wing is missing from the image:
    >>>CONTINUED>>>>>
    Why are they using a 737 when it was supposed to be a 767?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
    Why are they using a 737 when it was supposed to be a 767?
    Maybe its disinfo, limited hangout, psyops?

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 9/11 third tower mystery 'solved'
    By Gordon Gekko in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: March 20th, 2016, 12:12 PM
  2. Scientists cast doubt on JFK bullet analysis
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 9th, 2012, 08:27 PM
  3. LQQK! The Plan Is Coming Together!
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 30th, 2011, 07:47 PM
  4. Inflatable tower could climb to the edge of space
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 16th, 2009, 02:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts