My column count is different from other approaches...

It's 10s 8-9s 5-7s 2-4s. Giving consideration to EOR total sum of tags for 2-4s is nearly the same as 5-7s.

As for Insurance? It's perfect. Take your number of 10s played x 2 plus 4. The correlation will always be 33%. So if 10 tens are played then 24 non tens must be played for 33%. The idea is to always have the best matchups for every hand. Also, to bet when the deck is rich in 10-A. But, more importantly, not bet when the deck is more rich in another column.

I will stop here. If anyone is interested I will start a new thread. To me, forum discussions are like sitting around a table in the sportsbook bouncing idea's over a couple of beers. Im not trying to say Im any better (or worse) than anything one else. But we all have one common denominator which is winning.

For this, my thirst is unquenchable.

## Bookmarks