+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Dominator Dice Control -VIDEO

  1. #1

    Default Dominator Dice Control -VIDEO

    This MIGHT belong in voodoo ...

    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    947

    Default

    I used to be fairly good at DC. I haven't practiced in years so I am not anymore. I have been backed off more often at craps than for counting cards. I was backed off 3 times in one trip to Vegas for being too good at DC. I was never backed off in AC but I know someone that has been. Most people are not very good or delusional about their ability to control the dice. That is why they worry about SSR (not rolling the 7) and why they bet the lowest house edge bets on the table. If you understand anything about math you know that if you can affect the odds of the roll of the dice the high house edge bets will have the largest advantage.

    The guy I know that has been backed off the most (they don't offer him the dice when it is his turn) in AC gets backed of because he bets the hop and wins like crazy. The hop is a one roll bet that your dice will come up to be two specific numbers. The house edge is around 16% if memory serves. It pays 15 to 1 on a roll that should come up 1 in every 18 times unless you are talking about rolling doubles. He would hit his hop far more frequently that 1 in every 15 rolls. The casinos didn't like this fact and he would have to wait until someone didn't recognize him to shoot the dice but unfortunately nobody rolled the dice using the same mechanics that he did. So he was always quickly spotted.

    If anyone says they can control the dice and bets the passerine you know they have their doubts about their ability. If you can rewrite the odds of the numbers being rolled your biggest advantage will be on certain rolls that pay the highest odds. It doesn't take my level of genius to figure that out.

  3. #3
    Boz's Avatar
    Boz is offline Major Asshole Bet Welshing Loser - BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post
    I used to be fairly good at DC. I haven't practiced in years so I am not anymore. I have been backed off more often at craps than for counting cards. I was backed off 3 times in one trip to Vegas for being too good at DC. I was never backed off in AC but I know someone that has been. Most people are not very good or delusional about their ability to control the dice. That is why they worry about SSR (not rolling the 7) and why they bet the lowest house edge bets on the table. If you understand anything about math you know that if you can affect the odds of the roll of the dice the high house edge bets will have the largest advantage.

    The guy I know that has been backed off the most (they don't offer him the dice when it is his turn) in AC gets backed of because he bets the hop and wins like crazy. The hop is a one roll bet that your dice will come up to be two specific numbers. The house edge is around 16% if memory serves. It pays 15 to 1 on a roll that should come up 1 in every 18 times unless you are talking about rolling doubles. He would hit his hop far more frequently that 1 in every 15 rolls. The casinos didn't like this fact and he would have to wait until someone didn't recognize him to shoot the dice but unfortunately nobody rolled the dice using the same mechanics that he did. So he was always quickly spotted.

    If anyone says they can control the dice and bets the passerine you know they have their doubts about their ability. If you can rewrite the odds of the numbers being rolled your biggest advantage will be on certain rolls that pay the highest odds. It doesn't take my level of genius to figure that out.
    LOL, did he really fucking write this?

  4. #4
    Boz's Avatar
    Boz is offline Major Asshole Bet Welshing Loser - BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post
    Most people are not very good or delusional about their ability to control the dice.
    Speak of the devil.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boz View Post
    LOL, did he really fucking write this?
    Yes and more you cesspool turd.

    I kept exacting records but I am not going to try to remember what was set aside decades ago. What I can say is I had extreme control of the left die and enough control of the right die that I was quite profitable placing the 6 and 8. I never worried about SSR but mine was a little better than random. I worried about rolling winners. I saw a lot of people with a very high SSR that could not win money because they couldn't roll enough winners to be profitable even with the 7 coming out much less than expected. SSR is bullshit unless you also know what numbers to bet on. I rolled the 6 and 8 about twice as often as they are expected to be rolled. That gave me a nice edge without worrying about the 7.

  6. #6
    Boz's Avatar
    Boz is offline Major Asshole Bet Welshing Loser - BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post
    Yes and more you cesspool turd.

    I kept exacting records but I am not going to try to remember what was set aside decades ago. What I can say is I had extreme control of the left die and enough control of the right die that I was quite profitable placing the 6 and 8. I never worried about SSR but mine was a little better than random. I worried about rolling winners. I saw a lot of people with a very high SSR that could not win money because they couldn't roll enough winners to be profitable even with the 7 coming out much less than expected. SSR is bullshit unless you also know what numbers to bet on. I rolled the 6 and 8 about twice as often as they are expected to be rolled. That gave me a nice edge without worrying about the 7.
    You're a fraud, Lady Tthree.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boz View Post
    You're a fraud, Lady Tthree.
    Little zzone clown, I have forgotten more than you will ever know about skilled dice tossing and betting...

    I had decades of exhaustive practice records on my very own full length craps table.

    I used 2 different color die so i could track what each did. I would try to get the dice to tumble so you would eliminate the sides of the dice as they sit in the set from coming up. I tracked each dies outcome on each roll. I grouped them in groups of 24 so the expected number of times you would successfully avoid the sides was 16 out of 24. The left die would almost always have over 20 with 20 successes out of 24 attempts being very rare. The right die would tend to have 17 to 19 successes in 24 throws and I can't remember it ever having less than the expected 16 after decades of practice every day for 1 to 3 hours a day. The outcome of each die was definitely being affected to different degrees. Then I was tasked with determining the best bets to make given the altered likelihood of each number being rolled. For me that was placing the 6 and 8. If I had the same control of the right die as the left I would have laid the 5 and 9 because they would hardly ever be rolled because if I put 3 and 4 as the 2 sides of the dice that are on axis for the tumble and was successful at tumbling both dice it would be impossible to roll a 5 or 9. Then I would have placed the numbers that are most likely to hit and press aggressively as they hit. Unfortunately I was not that good. No matter how much I practiced the right die would not increase the tumble rate. With the control I had being limited by weak control of the right die I placed the 6 and 8 and concentrated on a dice set for rolling them as frequently as possible. The idea is you want as little exposure to the short rolls that will happen once in a while. You want to get your money off the table as soon as possible or practical. You want to ensure a profit. And then you wanted to press your bets to make the stakes worthwhile. With the skewing of the odds of the outcomes there was a sweet spot for whatever your rolling results are. I was asked to analyze many peoples rolls but few had a sample size large enough to determine the right numbers to bet and the style of pressing bets to maximize your return. I would tell people that staked me how to bet on my rolls. They just needed to decide what multiple of that advice they would use. Of course some had to do their own thing. After a while of seeing how the ones that followed my advice did compared to their results most followed the outline.


    Maybe that last part is why I was backed off so much in Vegas. Exponential return is kind of scary to the casinos if losses are rare. I rarely went to Vegas but, when I went, by the end of the week some of the casinos we frequented were not happy with me throwing the dice.
    Last edited by Lady Tthree; September 4th, 2016 at 03:12 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    407

    Default

    Now I know why that game is called crap!
    AP: Advanced Ploppy.

    After over 10000 BS bragging posts, it turns out that T3 doesn't even play BJ! What a damn joke, LOL!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post
    Little zzone clown, I have forgotten more than you will ever know about skilled dice tossing and betting...

    I had decades of exhaustive practice records on my very own full length craps table.

    I used 2 different color die so i could track what each did. I would try to get the dice to tumble so you would eliminate the sides of the dice as they sit in the set from coming up. I tracked each dies outcome on each roll. I grouped them in groups of 24 so the expected number of times you would successfully avoid the sides was 16 out of 24. The left die would almost always have over 20 with 20 successes out of 24 attempts being very rare. The right die would tend to have 17 to 19 successes in 24 throws and I can't remember it ever having less than the expected 16 after decades of practice every day for 1 to 3 hours a day. The outcome of each die was definitely being affected to different degrees. Then I was tasked with determining the best bets to make given the altered likelihood of each number being rolled. For me that was placing the 6 and 8. If I had the same control of the right die as the left I would have laid the 5 and 9 because they would hardly ever be rolled because if I put 3 and 4 as the 2 sides of the dice that are on axis for the tumble and was successful at tumbling both dice it would be impossible to roll a 5 or 9. Then I would have placed the numbers that are most likely to hit and press aggressively as they hit. Unfortunately I was not that good. No matter how much I practiced the right die would not increase the tumble rate. With the control I had being limited by weak control of the right die I placed the 6 and 8 and concentrated on a dice set for rolling them as frequently as possible. The idea is you want as little exposure to the short rolls that will happen once in a while. You want to get your money off the table as soon as possible or practical. You want to ensure a profit. And then you wanted to press your bets to make the stakes worthwhile. With the skewing of the odds of the outcomes there was a sweet spot for whatever your rolling results are. I was asked to analyze many peoples rolls but few had a sample size large enough to determine the right numbers to bet and the style of pressing bets to maximize your return. I would tell people that staked me how to bet on my rolls. They just needed to decide what multiple of that advice they would use. Of course some had to do their own thing. After a while of seeing how the ones that followed my advice did compared to their results most followed the outline.


    Maybe that last part is why I was backed off so much in Vegas. Exponential return is kind of scary to the casinos if losses are rare. I rarely went to Vegas but, when I went, by the end of the week some of the casinos we frequented were not happy with me throwing the dice.
    Dear 3, just cease and desist coming here with more of your convuluted bullshit. So now you are also a craps genius! LOL. Just stay over there sucking N0rm and everyone will be happy.

    And ferchrissakes, how many friggin 3s are there these days?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Katz View Post
    Dear 3, just cease and desist coming here with more of your convuluted bullshit. So now you are also a craps genius!
    Yes, ugly little jew-baiting zzone hater.

    I have more years of practice statistics recording the outcome of the right die and the left die on every roll for 3 or more hours of practice a day that any other practitioner on the planet. My stats would prove you wrong and casino results to match that would suggest you are wrong to question my ability.

    It is simply a physical skill thats hard to master and perishable without practice to stay fresh. Then you need casino conditions that match your practice table to be sure your practice will reflect what will happen in the casino. I decided I liked a more stable edge and switched to other opportunities when they started regularly changing the landing surface.

    Had dice conditions remained good I would not now be one of the card counter blackjack greats.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post

    Had dice conditions remained good I would not now be one of the card counter blackjack greats.
    You're not one of any greats, except ... great at BULLSHIT

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Tthree View Post
    Yes, ugly little jew-baiting zzone hater.

    I have more years of practice statistics recording the outcome of the right die and the left die on every roll for 3 or more hours of practice a day that any other practitioner on the planet. My stats would prove you wrong and casino results to match that would suggest you are wrong to question my ability.

    It is simply a physical skill thats hard to master and perishable without practice to stay fresh. Then you need casino conditions that match your practice table to be sure your practice will reflect what will happen in the casino. I decided I liked a more stable edge and switched to other opportunities when they started regularly changing the landing surface.

    Had dice conditions remained good I would not now be one of the card counter blackjack greats.
    Yes...THESE are the Jews I bait


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,590

    Default

    Perhaps the most outstanding work has been done at Duke University where Dr JB Rhine and his associates have demonstrated that psychokinesis, the name given to designate the power of mind by which material objects are influenced, is much more than idle theory.

    Craps dice were thrown by a mechanical device to eliminate all possibility of personal influence and trickery. Since 1934 when experiments of this type were started, there have been many tests in which millions of dice throws have been made. The results were such as to cause Dr Rhine to declare that: "There is no better explanation than the subjects influenced the fall of the dice without any recognized physical contact with them."

    By mentally concentrating upon the appearance of certain numbers, while at the same time they stood at a distance to avoid all physical contact with the mechanical thrower or the dice, the experimenters were frequently able to control the dice.

    In a number of the experiments the scores made under psychokinesis refuted some of the traditional mathematical odds of millions to one against the reappearance of certain combinations of numbers in repeated succession.

    From the book The Magic of Believing by Claude Bristol p29

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Setting the Dice
    By Katz in forum Non-BJ Advantage Play
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: August 24th, 2016, 02:25 PM
  2. Mass Control & The Future of Mankind -Video
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: July 24th, 2016, 12:42 PM
  3. Zender on Dice Control
    By Katz in forum Voodoo & Unconfirmed Gambling Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 19th, 2015, 03:20 AM
  4. Scobe's New Dice-Control Book
    By Katz in forum Non-BJ Advantage Play
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: March 28th, 2015, 03:58 AM
  5. Third Eye Control -VIDEO
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 12th, 2014, 02:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts