+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Did All Dinosaurs Have Feathers?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    1,603

    Default Did All Dinosaurs Have Feathers?


    The feathered dinosaur shown in this artist's conception, is thought to have weighed more than 3,000 pounds.

    LOS ANGELES — The discovery of a giant meat-eating dinosaur sporting a downy coat has some scientists reimagining the look of Tyrannosaurus rex.
    With a killer jaw and sharp claws, T. rex has long been depicted in movies and popular culture as having scaly skin. But the discovery of an earlier relative suggests the king of dinosaurs may have had a softer side.


    The evidence comes from the unearthing of a new tyrannosaur species in northeastern China that lived 60 million years before T. rex. The fossil record preserved remains of fluffy down, making it the largest feathered dinosaur ever found.


    If a T. rex relative had feathers, why not T. rex? Scientists said the evidence is trending in that direction.


    "People need to start changing their image of T. rex," said Luis Chiappe, director of the Dinosaur Institute at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, who was not part of the discovery team.

    MORE- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46954385...e#.T6yz-etYtGI

  2. #2

    Default

    Another pseudo-science theory disproved. Let us see how long it takes to teach this in school and how long newer ideas take. The cycles of science goes on.

    To me this always seemed likely. Feathers are rarely preserved as a fossil. Flight feathers just appearing on their own was pretty weak. The feathers needed to exist in another form first. What useful purpose are they attributing to the downy feathers? Looks like the old standbys. Nothing new that may have been the original function of feathers before they evolved into other uses.
    Last edited by shred; May 11th, 2012 at 06:19 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    posting from Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    8,965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shred View Post
    Another pseudo-science theory disproved. Let us see how long it takes to teach this in school and how long newer ideas take. The cycles of science goes on.

    To me this always seemed likely. Feathers are rarely preserved as a fossil. Flight feathers just appearing on their own was pretty weak. The feathers needed to exist in another form first. What useful purpose are they attributing to the downy feathers? Looks like the old standbys. Nothing new that may have been the original function of feathers before they evolved into other uses.
    Pseudo-science, or best guess disproven? Hypothesis is a valid part of science.
    Wrong will be right, when Aslan comes in sight
    At the sound of his roar, sorrows will be no more,
    When he bares his teeth, winter meets its death,
    And when he shakes his mane, we shall have spring again.


  4. #4

    Default

    The sciences based on extrapolation way beyond what is statistically valid to come up with unprovable hypothesis I like to call pseudo-sciences. They make guesses with the highest degree of certainty they can. That degree of certainty is very low however.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    1,603

    Default

    Dinosaurs are now believed by some scientists to have had feathers, been
    closer to today's birds than to today's lizards, and they were WARM-blooded.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts