+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: About #9/11, Army Officer Takes Bush Officials to Court April 5th

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    3,188

    Default About #9/11, Army Officer Takes Bush Officials to Court April 5th



    Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice

    NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

    The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.
    Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

    On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

    Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.
    The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

    Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

    The 9/11 Commission reported that "by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center."

    Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

    Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

    Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

    On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

    Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts is scientifically untenable.

    In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

    German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:
    "No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

    Also, that "it is not acceptable for a constitutional state...to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation," without first identifying suspects.

    Dieseroth also said the U.S. "was under burden of proof" that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

    The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world's understanding of history, not to mention American citizens' relationship with their government.

    Media contact:
    William Veale
    centerfor911justice@gmail.com,
    292929@msn.com,
    510-845-5675, 925-212-3678

    SOURCE Center for 9/11 Justice

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    3,188

    Default Is the fix in?: #Bush cousin presides over #9/11 suit against #Cheney, #Rumsfeld

    The fix is in: Bush cousin presides over
    9/11 suit against Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers


    Posted: April 10, 2011 by Craig McKee


    Tags: 9/11, 9/11 truth, April Gallop, CIA, conspiracies, Controlled demolition, David Ray Griffin, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, explosives, False flag operations, Flight 77, George Bush, hijacked planes, media, official story, Pentagon, propaganda, World Trade Center 7


    Walker: he'll decide if case against his
    cousin's friends goes forward.


    By Craig McKee

    No, it’s not a joke.

    A 9/11 lawsuit against former high officials in the Bush White House is being presided over by a cousin of former president George W. Bush – a shocking and blatant conflict of interest that should embarrass even believers in the official story.

    George W. Bush’s cousin, Judge John M. Walker of the 2nd Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals, is part of a three-judge panel hearing the case of April Gallop vs. former vice-president Dick Cheney, former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers.

    The case has been ignored by the mainstream media in the weeks leading up to it going to court April 5. And most media have ignored the developments concerning the involvement of Judge Walker. One exception is CNBC, which carried an online story with the headline: “Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: Bush Cousin Presides Over Federal Court Case Against Former Bush Administration Officials.” Good for them, but this is an all-too isolated exception. That the story is being kept almost entirely out of the media further reveals that the idea of a free and vigorous press is largely a fantasy.

    Gallop, a former U.S. Army executive administrative assistant (with top secret clearance), is suing for damages in connection with injuries she and her newborn son suffered in the supposed terrorist attack at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. The two were injured when the allegedly hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 supposedly slammed into the building. Gallop and many others in the 9/11 Truth movement contend that explosives were planted inside the Pentagon and that Flight 77 never hit the building.

    Gallop says a large explosion caused the ceiling above her to collapse. When she regained consciousness, she made her way, son in tow, through the hole the alleged plane was supposed to have created. She says she never saw any evidence that a plane had hit the building. The government claims that 125 people were killed in the Pentagon and another 89 on the plane.

    As I reported in a previous post, the Pentagon has refused to help Gallop with surgeries she and her son have required because of the event. They’ve even tried to stop other agencies like the American Red Cross from helping her, according to David Ray Griffin’s account in his book The New Pearl Harbor Revisited.

    Gallop launched the original lawsuit in 2008 alleging that the 9/11 attacks were planned at the highest levels of the U.S. government, and that they were blamed on fundamentalist Muslims as part of a cover story. She claims that there was plenty of knowledge that employees of the Pentagon were in imminent danger, and that had alarms been sounded many deaths and injuries would have been prevented.

    The idea that Cheney knew a plane was heading for the Pentagon is supported by the 9/11 Commission hearing testimony of the then transportation secretary, Norman Mineta. Mineta reported to the Commission that Cheney was in the presidential bunker prior to the Pentagon “crash” and was tracking the plane as it approached the Pentagon but not taking action to intercept it.

    MORE- http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com...feld/#more-551
    Last edited by DDutton; April 12th, 2011 at 11:22 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. April 6 Sneak Attack By US On Iran!
    By zengrifter in forum Real Politika
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2013, 08:01 PM
  2. GOP Officials Brace for Losses
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 11th, 2006, 12:53 PM
  3. Lay Takes Bush Secrets To Wherever He's Gone
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 8th, 2006, 02:20 AM
  4. High court denies Bush tribunals
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 29th, 2006, 01:44 PM
  5. Bush-NSA Spying in Defiance of Congress, Court
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 30th, 2005, 12:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts