+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: A Little Known Fact About The 9/11 Planes

  1. #1

    Default A Little Known Fact About The 9/11 Planes

    A Little Known Fact About The 9/11 Planes

    By Anthony Lawson
    RENSE | 6-20-10


    Extract: ...it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised 'War on Terror' would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.

    It is not a theory but a fact-one that is well known within the 9/11 truth movement-that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001.

    One does not need to be a Harvard Law School graduate to know that the first and most important requirement in any murder investigation is to determine the cause of death, which often leads to a requirement to identify, and trace to its origins, a murder weapon, or, in the case of 9/11: weapons. And there can be no doubt that each of the four planes which were allegedly hijacked on the morning 9/11 was posited as being a murder weapon, by the U.S. administration and the 9/11 Commission, yet there is absolutely nothing which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11 crash sites.

    In fact it is not fanciful to suggest that if a lawyer, even of a far lower calibre than that of an Alan Dershowitz, were engaged to defend the airport security companies that allegedly allowed 19 box-cutter-carrying Arabs to get onto those planes, he would immediately call for the dismissal of such an action on the grounds that the planes which allegedly hit the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the one which crashed near Shanksville had never been forensically identified as the planes which, allegedly, had been hijacked that morning.

    MORE- http://rense.com/general91/alitt.htm
    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Atlanta area
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Another smoking gun? Or just a clerical error?

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDutton View Post
    Another smoking gun? Or just a clerical error?
    Can it be that not one of the planes was ever positively identified via proper forensic protocol??
    "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."
    .....................The Zengrifter Interview (PDF) |
    The Zengrifter / James Grosjean Reputation Debate
    -----------------------------------------
    “Truth, like gold, is obtained not by growth, but by washing away all that is not gold.” — Leo Tolstoy........
    "Is everything a conspiracy? No, just the important stuff." ZG

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,587

    Default

    Avionics Expert - A 911
    Remote Control Lesson
    For Popular Mechanics

    From Jon Carlson
    carlson.jon@att.net
    3-16-5



    In response to the article on the photo showing odd shapes on the bottom of the airliner that struck the South Tower, an Avionics expert has a RC lesson for Popular Mechanics and all of us.
    Excerpts from his emails:
    I have 35 years experience in this area of Avionics on numerous military and commercial
    aircraft.
    I took the first digital avionic system aircraft to the field in 1969 and have worked on numerous military aircraft, and studied the architecture on just about all commercial air-carriers over the last 30 some years.
    Instrumentation packages added to aircraft to augment control or take over automatic flight control are old hat.
    The package shown on your photo is evidently a receiver and the associated electronics required to replace the AFCS package (Auto Pilot and Stability Control Unit).
    The two blade antenna (CIRCLED IN YELLOW) are not normal (Their reflections makes it looks like a last minute add on.) for this type plane. They are VHF (too large for UHF) antennas used to control the replacement autopilot package.
    This looks like a remote control package on this aircraft. What you are looking at is not the normal configuration of a commercial aircraft.
    FROM: http://www.dtccom.com/uav-uvg-and-robots.html
    In UAV applications, signal bounce off the earth or buildings may induce fading, causing signal breakup. DTC is reknowned for its line of true diversity receivers, using spatial diversity to overcome fades and multipath. Pairs of receivers and antennas tuned to the same frequency are used to receive a single transmitted signal. A proprietary voting logic board votes to the best signal during the horizontal retrace, over 15,000 times per second. This greatly enhances video quality.
    DTC's miniature microwave video transmitters and receivers are well suited for UAV downlinks, transmitting one channel of video and up to two telemetry channels over audio subcarriers
    THE PREDATOR is state-of-the-art UAV technology.
    From: http://science.howstuffworks.com/predator2.htm
    Blade antennas as on the South Tower airliner are circled in yellow. More antennas are located inside the front of the aircraft circled in red.


    SOURCE: http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Jewnited States
    Posts
    1,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Katz View Post
    Avionics Expert - A 911
    Remote Control Lesson
    For Popular Mechanics

    From Jon Carlson
    carlson.jon@att.net
    3-16-5



    In response to the article on the photo showing odd shapes on the bottom of the airliner that struck the South Tower, an Avionics expert has a RC lesson for Popular Mechanics and all of us.
    Excerpts from his emails:
    I have 35 years experience in this area of Avionics on numerous military and commercial
    aircraft.
    I took the first digital avionic system aircraft to the field in 1969 and have worked on numerous military aircraft, and studied the architecture on just about all commercial air-carriers over the last 30 some years.
    Instrumentation packages added to aircraft to augment control or take over automatic flight control are old hat.
    The package shown on your photo is evidently a receiver and the associated electronics required to replace the AFCS package (Auto Pilot and Stability Control Unit).
    The two blade antenna (CIRCLED IN YELLOW) are not normal (Their reflections makes it looks like a last minute add on.) for this type plane. They are VHF (too large for UHF) antennas used to control the replacement autopilot package.
    This looks like a remote control package on this aircraft. What you are looking at is not the normal configuration of a commercial aircraft.
    FROM: http://www.dtccom.com/uav-uvg-and-robots.html
    In UAV applications, signal bounce off the earth or buildings may induce fading, causing signal breakup. DTC is reknowned for its line of true diversity receivers, using spatial diversity to overcome fades and multipath. Pairs of receivers and antennas tuned to the same frequency are used to receive a single transmitted signal. A proprietary voting logic board votes to the best signal during the horizontal retrace, over 15,000 times per second. This greatly enhances video quality.
    DTC's miniature microwave video transmitters and receivers are well suited for UAV downlinks, transmitting one channel of video and up to two telemetry channels over audio subcarriers
    THE PREDATOR is state-of-the-art UAV technology.
    From: http://science.howstuffworks.com/predator2.htm
    Blade antennas as on the South Tower airliner are circled in yellow. More antennas are located inside the front of the aircraft circled in red.


    SOURCE: http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm
    This minor presentation supports the argument that airliners of some description were involved in 911. But that contention is preposterous given the absence of any substantiating evidence.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svengarlicky View Post
    This minor presentation supports the argument that airliners of some description were involved in 911. But that contention is preposterous given the absence of any substantiating evidence.
    Note the odd, abnormal configurations on the airliner fuselage on both images... Even to the amateur untrained eye, it's clear this was not a normal airliner... Note also those two white transmitters protruding from the under fuselage. This (image #1) is yet another 911 smoking gun.



    Last edited by Katz; July 12th, 2014 at 08:33 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,587

    Default

    I was just in touch with Phil Zelikow there, about this disturbing image showing two white antennae protruding from the fuselage. His response? WTF are you talking about? Those are not antennae, they are birds. You are seriously wrong and deranged. America is a good Christian nation. IN GOD WE TRUST. Ask Aslan, he will put you straight on this. In the meantime just STFU, for God's sake!




    Last edited by Katz; July 12th, 2014 at 11:00 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,587

    Default

    AND, Phil continued, like I said, those are birds, white doves in fact... the bird of peace. Anyone with eyes to see can see that, quite clearly. In fact, there are no antennae at all. Even if those were antennae (which they are certainly not!) what is wrong with that? Next time you are at an airport take a look around. You'll see any number of airliners around, with atennae sticking out all over the place, including white ones under their bellies where doves hang out. Trust me on this. Phil Z, writer of Truth.







  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    In the YO
    Posts
    15,587

    Default

    Yes, Phil. Your partners-in-crime really screwed up on those two white antennae sticking down there. All the idjits had to do was colour them black or grey and probably nobody would have noticed. But we here on the Zen Zone have sharp eyes and minds sharp enough to see through the deceit and sheer bullshit making up most of your Report.

    Those two antennae is one hellova 911 Smoking Gun for you to try to explain, Phil. But I am not holding my breath. So let me explain for you: Yes, Mr Katz, you are exactly right. That aircraft was a robot and in fact had no passengers at all. Those antennae were part of the first class technology we developed and installed to guide aircraft like a guided missile. Our CIA geeks fitted the planes out, at an airfield not all that far from their targets. Nice work, eh? We nailed it plumb on! Hasta la vista baby!

    Oh, and a few people had to die that day, but what the hell; the end justifies the means! Everyone will be a lot better off in our FEMA camps as our slave labor. Trust me on this. You'll see. Phil



    Last edited by Katz; July 14th, 2014 at 07:32 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No Planes on 911- Exposing the Illusion
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2016, 10:22 AM
  2. Psychedelic Experience - Fact or Fantasy?
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 12th, 2016, 11:32 AM
  3. 911 Hijacker Believed Planes Were Being Landed By Remote Control
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: July 14th, 2014, 08:17 PM
  4. The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: May 9th, 2009, 03:19 PM
  5. Grotesque fact of the day: Gates and Buffett
    By zengrifter in forum ZenZone General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 30th, 2007, 03:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts